Осквернённые игроки

Corrupted player in the Alpha-1 preview.^[1]

When you gain that corruption you have the potential of losing your completed items, your weapon, your armor, stuff that is very difficult to achieve; and then the other aspect of that is, that in order to deter basically players taking alternate characters and saying this is my PK alt, the more players you kill, the more corruption you gain, the higher your combat efficacy in PVP diminishes. If you're out there and you killed 20 players... you will not be able to perform in PVP any longer. You will need to take that character and go work off that corruption. The other aspect of corruption is that if you kill another player, who is a non-combatant and the level disparity between you and that player is great, you will gain a higher amount of corruption from that single kill. To the point where you should not be killing a level one character.^[2] – Steven Sharif

Si un personaje combatiente (morado) o su invocación, mata a un personaje no combatiente (verde), o a cualquiera de sus unidades controladas, en PvP de mundo abierto, será marcado como corrupto (rojo).^[3]^[4]^[5] La corrupción obtenida por matar entidades controladas tiene un valor inferior al de matar jugadores.^[3]

El objetivo del sistema de corrupción es mantener vivo el riesgo y, al mismo tiempo, restringir o disuadir significativamente la capacidad de los jugadores para griefear otros jugadores.^[6]^[7]

It is my expectation that the system will perform very well in keeping risk alive, but significantly curtailing or deterring the ability for players to grief.^[7] – Steven Sharif

La puntuación de corrupción de un jugador (valor de corrupción) aumenta con cada jugador no combatiente muerto.^[6]^[8]^[9]^[10] La puntuación de corrupción tiene un impacto gradual en la eficacia de las habilidades de un personaje en combate PvP .^[11]^[12] Cuanto mayor sea la puntuación de corrupción:
- Más se reducen las habilidades y estadísticas (menos salud y maná, menos competencia con el equipo), hasta que el jugador corrupto se vuelve ineficaz en el combate..^[11]^[6]^[13]^[2]^[14]^[15] This dampening only affects PvP combat.^[16]
The more corruption you gain, the less effective you become in PvP and there's going to be a certain period at which point you have gained enough corruption that you're going to be gearless and you're also going to have a massive reduction in your PvP efficacy.^[14] – Steven Sharif
- Mayor probabilidad de que caigan materias primas y equipo (armas y armadura) al morir el jugador corrupto.^[6]^[9]^[2]^[17]^[14]
If you go on a murder spree and you have 10 pks under your belt then you might start feeling a significant dampening to your skill effects against other players. I don't want to give necessarily a number or curve for players to extrapolate prior to us having the ability to actually test these ideas and where those numbers are going to lie; but I would say what is the intent behind that dampening: The intent isn't to limit the fun of the player, the intent is to provide a give-and-take or a risk-versus-reward; and the risk of continuing down the road of accruing corruption is not only the loss of your gear and amplified death effects but also your ability to perform in that activity.^[18] – Steven Sharif
- Las penalizaciones por corrupción se producen a medida que se va ganando.^[19]

Reward without risk is meaningless... Corruption is just another word for risk.^[20] – Steven Sharif

Cuanto mayor sea la disparidad de nivel entre los jugadores, y cuanto más alto sea el valor de PK del atacante, más corrupción ganará..^[6]^[13]^[8]^[9]^[10]

Corruption value from PK'ing a non-combatant is based on level disparity along with the PKer's cumulative PK value.^[8] – Steven Sharif

Los jugadores corruptos sufren penalizaciones de muerte cuatro veces superiores a las de los no combatientes.^[6]^[9]

You can't necessarily time perfectly the damage or understand even the health of the player. Unless you were in their party you cannot see an opponent's health as well, so that's another component that adds risk..^[21] – Steven Sharif

Los jugadores corruptos pueden ser atacados independientemente de otras afiliaciones. Esto es algo que se probará durante la Alfa-2.^[22]
- Si un no combatiente ataca a un jugador corrupto, el no combatiente no será marcado como combatiente.^[11]^[23]
- Los no combatientes que curen, potencien, o ayuden de cualquier otra forma a combatientes o jugadores corruptos serán marcados como combatientes.^[11]^[24]^[25]^[26]

La ubicación de un jugador corrupto se revela a los cazarrecompensas en sus mapas del mundo.^[13]^[9]^[27]^[5]

Los jugadores corruptos pueden matar cazarrecompensas sin adquirir puntuación de corrupción adicional.^[28]^[29]
- Las penalizaciones de combate de los jugadores corruptos no se aplican cuando luchan contra cazarrecompensas.^[28]

El comercio entre jugadores, la interacción con vendedores o PNJs, y la posibilidad de acceder a los almacenes está deshabilitados para los jugadores corruptos.^[30]^[6]^[31]
- Anteriormente se había dicho que los jugadores corruptos no podrían almacenar objetos en los almacenes públicos pero que si que podrían usar los almacenes privados de sus freeholds.^[6]^[31]
- Los jugadores corruptos podrán utilizar el almacenamiento privado en sus parcelas (Freeholds).^[31]

Hay un temporizador de 60 segundos para desconectarse mientras se es corrupto. Forzar la desconexión del cliente durante el tiempo de enfriamiento dejará al personaje dentro del juego.^[11]^[32]

Q: Will there be any large-scale consequences when many players in a group guild region religion etc become corrupted frequently or for an extended period of time?

A: There are not group dynamics or mechanics that revolve around mass murdering people in the world. The corruption system is intended to deter mass murdering, not to provide incentives by which players can go out and gain corruption.^[33] – Steven Sharif

Q: If my guild has no one corrupted and your guild is like always killing people and always corrupted, will your guild have repercussions because they're corrupted versus my guild?

A: No I don't think so either. And the reason why is we want to deter it, but we don't want to make the system meaningless; and if the deterrent becomes too heavy-handed then it's a system without a purpose. And I think that the intent behind the corruption is that like during a rise in passion and like anger and whatever you want to make this decision and do something and you'll suffer the repercussions later. But if those repercussions are just overwhelmingly bad and even anti-social in the sense that like your guild is like hey man you went corrupted and this gives us like corruption points on the guild, and like you're out of here, then people just aren't going to choose to use it; and then at which point might as well just take it out. So I think there's a healthy balance between the type of deterrent used.^[34] – Steven Sharif